Hybrid and Native Applications
When we talk about hybrid applications, we refer to technologies such as JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, which are combined and processed through frameworks like Ionic, React Native, Titanium, PhoneGap, among others. As iOS and Android gained popularity, numerous hybrid frameworks emerged in parallel—non-native technologies designed to create a single codebase capable of generating cross-platform mobile applications.
The main goal is to develop an application once and run it on multiple platforms with as few specific adjustments as possible. This approach helps optimize development time and reduce costs without sacrificing functionality.
A native application is developed specifically for a mobile operating system, either iOS or Android. In the case of iOS, languages like Swift or Objective-C are used, while for Android, Java is the primary programming language.
By using each platform’s official languages, native applications achieve optimal performance and deeper integration with the operating system’s functionalities.
Comparison: Hybrid vs. Native Applications
Now then, imagine you're about to start a new project and face a key decision: choosing between developing a hybrid or a native application. At this point, it's important to consider the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Therefore, below we explore both options in order to help you make an informed decision aligned with your project’s needs.
| Aspect | Hybrid Applications | Native Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Development | A single codebase for multiple platforms. | Platform-specific code for each operating system (iOS and Android). |
| Time to Market | Faster. Allows the product to be launched in less time. | Slower. Requires separate development for each platform. |
| Hardware Access | Limited or through intermediate layers. | Direct and optimized access to device functionalities. |
| Performance | Good, but may be lower in complex or demanding tasks. | High performance, faster speed, and lower memory usage. |
| Hardware Usage | Less efficient compared to native apps. | Full utilization of the device’s hardware. |
| Development Cost | More economical: a single team can cover multiple platforms. | More expensive: requires specific developers for iOS and Android. |
| Maintenance | Simpler. One codebase to update. | More complex. Requires maintaining two codebases. |
| Ideal for... | MVPs, projects with tight budgets, or fast launches. | Apps that require high performance and intensive use of native features. |
Wigilabs | We Love Peolple, We Love Technology.
What decision to make?
There is no single definitive answer to this choice. In fact, the decision will depend on several factors, such as the available financial resources, the team’s existing knowledge, the overall architecture of the solution, as well as the business objectives and the estimated development time.
On the one hand, hybrid applications offer a good level of quality at a generally lower cost than native applications. However, to develop a truly competitive product, it is essential to thoroughly analyze the project’s needs and technical requirements. Only then will it be possible to make a well-informed decision and, as a result, achieve the primary objective.
Likewise, to build a solid and efficient digital product, continuous support from the early stages is essential. This includes reviewing the project and conducting a detailed analysis of performance and user experience for each application. In this regard, Wigilabs provides specialized teams that offer comprehensive support throughout every phase of the process. Thanks to this, it is possible to develop a consistent, reliable digital product with an outstanding user experience.
At Wigilabs, we approach the conceptualization and development of projects with a simple methodology that allows us to achieve fast and effective results. You can ask about our consulting services with specialized teams by writing to comercial@wigilabs.com